Generative Competitive Research

The full record, in aggregate

Every study GCR has run since 2009, summarized by method, sector and frequency. Published in aggregate: no client names, no per-study dates, per our confidentiality policy.

Source: GCR Studies Ledger, 2009–2026

GCR's office in the Milla de Oro, Medellín

By collection method

Method Studies
Face-to-Face Interviews 77
In-Depth Interviews 74
CAWI 65
CATI 44
Focus Groups 31
Desk Research 21
Mystery Shopper 13
Project Management 8
Ethnography 3
CLT 1

By sector

Sector Studies Respondents
Health & Pharma 57 11,397
Sportswear 49 4,030
FMCG 40 32,877
Television 35 29,766
Automotive 23 14,954
Banking 15 1,500
Education 14 2,040
Nutrition 9 Base too small
Fashion 8 Desk research
Beverages 8 2,285
Gambling 8 2,024
Agriculture 8 1,405
Technology 7 1,074
Media 6 1,452
Personal Care 5 Base too small
Gaming 4 Base too small
Food 4 Base too small
Music 4 Base too small
Beauty 3 Desk research
Medical 3 1,033
Footwear 3 Base too small
Chemicals 3 Base too small
Petroleum 3 Base too small
Retail 3 Base too small
Hardware 3 Base too small
IT 2 Desk research
Packaging 2 Base too small
CPG 2 Base too small
NGO 2 2,000
Tourism 1 Desk research
Human Resources 1 Desk research
Telecommunications 1 Base too small
Insurance 1 1,000

Respondent totals count only sample-bearing methods (focus groups, in-depth interviews, CATI, CAWI and face-to-face). A respondent figure is shown only where the base reaches 1,000; below that the row reads "Base too small". Sectors with no sample at all were desk research, and say so.

Source: GCR Studies Ledger, 2009–2026

Know before you commit.

Tell us the decision you're weighing. We'll tell you what it would take to answer it — and whether we're the right team to do it.